{"id":362711,"date":"2024-10-20T01:41:44","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T01:41:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-en-iec-61000-4-32020-tc\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T02:40:38","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:40:38","slug":"bs-en-iec-61000-4-32020-tc","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-en-iec-61000-4-32020-tc\/","title":{"rendered":"BS EN IEC 61000-4-3:2020 – TC"},"content":{"rendered":"

PDF Catalog<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\nPDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\ncompares BS EN IEC 61000-4-3:2020
Incorporating corrigendum November 2020 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nTRACKED CHANGES
Text example 1 \u2014 indicates added text (in green) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nCompliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from legal obligations.
Amendments\/corrigenda issued since publication <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nJuly 2010October 2020 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nEndorsement notice
Foreword to amendment A1
Endorsement notice
Foreword to amendment A2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nEndorsement notice
Endorsement notice <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nINTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nINTRODUCTION
Part 1: General
Part 2: Environment
Part 3: Limits
Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques
Part 5: Installation and mitigation guidelines
Part 6: Generic standards
Part 9: Miscellaneous <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC) \u2013
1 Scope and object
2 Normative references
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
33.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n3.1
3.1.1
3.23.1.2
3.2.13.1.3
3.2.2
3.1.4
3.2.33.1.5
3.3
3.1.6 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n3.43.1.7
3.1.8
3.53.1.9
3.6
3.1.10
3.7
3.1.11
3.8 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\n3.1.12
3.93.1.13
3.10
3.11
3.123.1.14
3.133.1.15
3.14
3.15
3.163.1.16
3.1.17 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\n3.1.18
3.183.1.19
3.1.20
3.193.1.21
3.20
3.21
3.1.22 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\n3.223.1.23
3.1.24
3.24
3.25
3.26
3.27
3.1.25
3.1.26
3.1.27 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\n3.1.28
3.2 Abbreviated terms
4 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\n5 Test levels and frequency ranges
5.1 Selection of test level
Table 1 \u2013 Test levels related to general purpose, digital radio telephones and other RF emitting devices
5.1 Test levels related to general purposes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\n5.2 Test levels related to the protection against RF emissions from digital radio telephones and other RF emitting devices
Table 2 \u2013 Amplitude modulation characteristics at output of signal generator <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nFigure 1 \u2013 Definition of the 80 % amplitude modulated (AM) test signal and the waveshapes occurring
5.2 Test frequency ranges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\n6 Test equipment
6.1 Test instrumentation
6.16.2 Description of the test facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nFigure 2 \u2013 Example of suitable test facility
6.2 Calibration of field <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nFigure 3 \u2013 Level setting setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nFigure 4 \u2013 Dimensions of sixteen-point uniform field area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nFigure 5 \u2013 Minimum UFA size having a fifth grid point in the centre <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nTable 2 \u2013 Requirements for uniform field area for application of full illumination partial illumination and independent windows method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nTable 3 \u2013 Requirements for uniform field area for application of full illumination and partial illumination <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nFigure 6 \u2013 Measuring setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\n6.2.26.3.3 Constant power calibrationlevel setting method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\n7 Test setup
7.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\n7.17.2 Arrangement of table-top equipment
Figure 7 \u2013 Example of EUT setup and cable layout for table top EUT having a cable that leaves the test setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nFigure 8 \u2013 Example of EUT setup (top view) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\n7.37.4 Arrangement of wiring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\n7.47.5 Arrangement of human body-mounted equipment
8 Test procedure
8.1 General
8.18.2 Laboratory reference conditions
8.1.18.2.2 Climatic conditions
8.1.28.2.3 Electromagnetic conditions
8.28.3 Execution of the test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\n8.4 Step sizes
9 Evaluation of test results
10 Test report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nFigure 1 \u2013 Definition of the test level and the waveshapes occurring at the output of the signal generator
Figure 2 \u2013 Example of suitable test facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nFigure 5 \u2013 Example of test setup for floor-standing equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nFigure 7 \u2013 Measuring set-up <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nAnnex A
(informative)
A.1 Summary of available modulation methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nTable A.1 \u2013 Comparison of modulation methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nTable A.2 \u2013 Relative interference levels a <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nTable A.3 \u2013 Relative immunity levels a <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nA.3 Secondary modulation effects
A.4 Conclusion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51<\/td>\nAnnex B
(informative)
B.1 Biconical antenna
B.2 Log-periodic antenna
B.3 Combination antennas
B.3B.4 Horn antenna and double ridge wave guide antenna <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52<\/td>\nAnnex C
(informative)
C.1 General anechoic chamber information
Anechoic chambers are less effective at low frequencies (below 30 MHz), whereas ferrite-lined chambers may also be less effective at frequencies above 1 GHz. Care shall be taken to ensure the uniformity of the generated field at the lowest and highest…
C.2 Suggested adjustments to adapt for use at frequencies above 1 GHz ferrite-lined chambers designed for use at frequencies up to 1 GHz
C.2 Use of ferrite-lined chambers at frequencies above 1 GHz
C.2.1 Problems caused by the use of ferrite-lined chambers for radiated field immunity tests at frequencies above 1 GHz <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53<\/td>\nFigure C.1 \u2013 Multiple reflections in an existing small anechoic chamber
C.2.2 Possible solutionSolutions to reduce reflections
In order to solve existing problems, the following procedures are suggested.
The influence from reflections can be reduced in the following manner: <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
54<\/td>\nFigure C.2 \u2013 Most of the reflected waves are eliminated (applies for top and side view) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
55<\/td>\nAnnex D
(informative)
D.1 Objective of limiting amplifier distortion
D.2 Possible problems caused by harmonics and saturation
D.3 Options for controlling amplifier non-linearity
D.3.1D.3 Limiting the harmonic content in the field <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56<\/td>\nD.3.2 Measuring the harmonic content of the field
Figure D.1 \u2212 Measuring positions of the uniform field area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
57<\/td>\nD.4.1 Example for the calibration procedure using the constant field strength calibration method as described in 6.2.1
Table D.1 \u2013 Forward power values measured according to the constant field strength calibration method
Table D.2 \u2013 Forward power values sorted according to rising value and evaluation of the measuring result <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
58<\/td>\nD.4.2 Example for the calibration procedure using the constant power calibration method as described in 6.2.2
Table D.3 \u2013 Forward power and field strength values measured according to the constant power calibration method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
59<\/td>\nTable D.4 \u2013 Field strength values sorted according to rising value and evaluation of the measuring result
D.4 Effect of linearity characteristic on the immunity test
D.4.1 General
D.4.2 Evaluation method of the linearity characteristic <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
60<\/td>\nD.4.2.2 Evaluation process
Figure D.1 \u2013 Amplifier linearity measurement setup
D.4.2.3 Linearity criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
61<\/td>\nFigure D.2 \u2013 Example of linearity curve
D.4.2.4 Immunity test when the amplifier linearity characteristic does not meet the criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
62<\/td>\nAnnex E
(informative)
E.1 IntroductionGeneral
E.2 Test levels related to general purposes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
63<\/td>\nE.3 Test levels related to the protection against RF emissions from digital radio telephones
Table E.1 \u2013 Examples of test levels, associated protection distances and suggested performance criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
64<\/td>\nTable E.1 \u2013 Examples of test levels, associated protection distances and performance criteria
E.4 Special measures for fixed transmitters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
65<\/td>\nAnnex F
(informative) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
67<\/td>\nAnnex G
(informative)
G.1 Digital radio telephones <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
71<\/td>\nAnnex G
(informative)
G.1 Intentions of EUT setup for radiated immunity test
G.2 Cable in the field
G.3 Cables leaving the test area
G.4 Turning the EUT cabinets <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
72<\/td>\nAnnex H
(normative)
H.1 Introduction
H.2 Calibration of field <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
73<\/td>\nFigure H.1a \u2013 Example of division for table-top equipment
Figure H.1b \u2013 Example of division for floor-standing equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
74<\/td>\nFigure H.2 \u2013 Example of illumination of successive windows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
75<\/td>\nAnnex H
(informative)
H.1 EUTs with bottom fed cables
Figure H.1 \u2013 Example of a test setup for EUT with bottom fed underground cables (CMADs not shown) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
76<\/td>\nH.2 EUTs with overhead cables
Figure H.2 \u2013 Example of a test setup for EUTs with overhead cables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
77<\/td>\nH.3 EUTs with multiple cables and AEs
Figure H.3 \u2013 Example of a setup of EUTs with multiple cables and AEs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
78<\/td>\nH.4 Large EUTs with side fed cables and multiple UFA windows
Figure H.4 \u2013 Large EUTs with side fed cables and multiple UFAs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
79<\/td>\nAnnex I
(informative)
I.1 General
I.2 Intermodulation
Figure I.1 \u2013 Test frequencies f1 and f2 and intermodulation frequencies of the second and third order <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
80<\/td>\nI.3 Power requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
81<\/td>\nI.4 Level setting requirements
I.5 Linearity and harmonics checks
I.6 EUT performance criteria with multiple signals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
82<\/td>\nAnnex J
(informative)
J.1 General
J.2 Uncertainty budgets for level setting
J.2.1 Definition of the measurand
J.2.2 MU contributors of the measurand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
83<\/td>\nFigure J.1 \u2013 Example of influences upon level setting
J.2.3 Calculation examples for expanded uncertainty <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
84<\/td>\nTable J.1 \u2013 CalibrationLevel setting process
Table J.2 \u2013 Level settingTest process
J.2.4 Explanation of terms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
85<\/td>\nJ.3 Application
J.4 Reference documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
86<\/td>\nAnnex IAnnex K
(informative)
I.1K.1 Overview
I.2K.2 Probe calibration requirements
I.2.1K.2.1 General
I.2.2K.2.2 Calibration frequency range
I.2.3K.2.3 Frequency steps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
87<\/td>\nI.2.4K.2.4 Field strength
Table I.1K.1\u2013 Calibration field strength level
I.3.1K.3.2 Harmonics and spurious signals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
88<\/td>\nI.3.2K.3.3 Linearity check for probe
Table I.2K.2 \u2013 Example for the probe linearity check <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89<\/td>\nFigure I.1K.1 \u2013 Example of linearity for probe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90<\/td>\nI.4K.4 Field probe calibration in anechoic chambers
I.4.1K.4.1 Calibration environments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
91<\/td>\nI.4.2K.4.2 Validation of anechoic chambers for field probe calibration
I.4.2.1K.4.2.2 Measuring net power to a transmitting device using directional couplers
Figure I.2K.2\u2013 Setup for measuring net power to a transmitting device <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
92<\/td>\nI.4.2.2K.4.2.3 Establishing a standard field using horn antennas
I.4.2.3K.4.2.4 Chamber validation test frequency range and frequency steps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
93<\/td>\nI.4.2.4K.4.2.5 Chamber validation procedure
Figure I.3K.3 \u2013 Test setup for chamber validation test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
94<\/td>\nI.4.2.5K.4.2.6 VSWR acceptance criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
95<\/td>\nFigure I.5K.5\u2013 Example of data adjustment
I.4.2.6K.4.2.7 Probe fixture validation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
96<\/td>\nI.4.2.7K.4.2.8 Alternative chamber validation procedure
Figure I.6K.6 \u2013 Example of the test layout for antenna and probe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
98<\/td>\nFigure I.8K.8 \u2013 Example of alternative chamber validation data
I.4.3.1K.4.3.2 TestProbe calibration setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
99<\/td>\nFigure I.9K.9 \u2013 Field probe calibration layout <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
100<\/td>\nFigure I.10K.10 \u2013 Field probe calibration layout (Toptop view)
K.5.1 General
I.5.1K.5.2 Field probe calibration using TEM cells <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
102<\/td>\nI.5.3K.5.4 Field probe calibration using open-ended waveguides
I.5.4K.5.5 Calibration of field probes by gain transfer method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
103<\/td>\nI.6K.6 Reference documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
104<\/td>\nAnnex ZA
(normative) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
105<\/td>\nCENELEC interpretation sheet 1 February 2009
Foreword
Clause 5 Test levels
Question:
Interpretation:
Validity: <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
106<\/td>\nBibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
108<\/td>\nundefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
111<\/td>\nAnnex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
113<\/td>\nCONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
117<\/td>\nFOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
119<\/td>\nINTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
120<\/td>\n1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms
3.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
124<\/td>\n3.2 Abbreviated terms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
125<\/td>\n4 General
5 Test levels and frequency ranges
5.1 Selection of test level <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
126<\/td>\nTables
Table 1 \u2013 Test levels
Table 2 \u2013 Amplitude modulation characteristics at output of signal generator <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
127<\/td>\n5.2 Test frequency ranges
Figures
Figure 1 \u2013 Definition of the 80 % amplitude modulated (AM) test signal and the waveshapes occurring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
128<\/td>\n6 Test equipment
6.1 Test instrumentation
6.2 Description of the test facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
129<\/td>\n6.3 Uniform field area (UFA)
6.3.1 Characteristics of the UFA
Figure 2 \u2013 Example of suitable test facility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
130<\/td>\nFigure 3 \u2013 Level setting setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
131<\/td>\nFigure 4 \u2013 Dimensions of sixteen-point uniform field area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
132<\/td>\nFigure 5 \u2013 Minimum UFA size having a fifth grid point in the centre <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
133<\/td>\nTable 3 \u2013 Requirements for uniform field area for application of full illumination and partial illumination <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
134<\/td>\n6.3.2 Constant field strength level setting method
Figure 6 \u2013 Measuring setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
135<\/td>\n6.3.3 Constant power level setting method <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
136<\/td>\n7 Test setup
7.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
137<\/td>\n7.2 Arrangement of table-top equipment
Figure 7 \u2013 Example of EUT setup and cable layout for table top EUT having a cable that leaves the test setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
139<\/td>\n7.3 Arrangement of floor-standing equipment
Figure 8 \u2013 Example of EUT setup (top view) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
140<\/td>\n7.4 Arrangement of wiring <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
141<\/td>\n7.5 Arrangement of human body-mounted equipment
8 Test procedure
8.1 General
8.2 Laboratory reference conditions
8.2.1 General
8.2.2 Climatic conditions
8.2.3 Electromagnetic conditions
8.3 Execution of the test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
143<\/td>\n8.4 Step sizes
9 Evaluation of test results
10 Test report <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
145<\/td>\nAnnexes
Annex A (informative) Rationale for the choice of modulation for tests related to the protection against RF emissions from digital radio services
A.1 Summary of available modulation methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
146<\/td>\nA.2 Experimental results
Table A.1 \u2013 Comparison of modulation methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
147<\/td>\nTable A.2 \u2013 Relative interference levels a <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
148<\/td>\nTable A.3 \u2013 Relative immunity levels a <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
149<\/td>\nA.3 Secondary modulation effects
A.4 Conclusion <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
150<\/td>\nAnnex B (informative) Field generating antennas
B.1 Biconical antenna
B.2 Log-periodic antenna
B.3 Combination antennas
B.4 Horn antenna and double ridge wave guide antenna <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
151<\/td>\nAnnex C (informative) Use of anechoic chambers
C.1 General anechoic chamber information
C.2 Use of ferrite-lined chambers at frequencies above 1 GHz
C.2.1 Problems caused by the use of ferrite-lined chambers for radiated field immunity tests at frequencies above 1 GHz <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
152<\/td>\nC.2.2 Solutions to reduce reflections
Figure C.1 \u2013 Multiple reflections in an existing small anechoic chamber
Figure C.2 \u2013 Most of the reflected waves are eliminated(applies for top and side view) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
153<\/td>\nAnnex D (informative) Amplifier compression and non-linearity
D.1 Objective of limiting amplifier distortion
D.2 Possible problems caused by harmonics and saturation
D.3 Limiting the harmonic content in the field <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
154<\/td>\nD.4 Effect of linearity characteristic on the immunity test
D.4.1 General
D.4.2 Evaluation method of the linearity characteristic <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
155<\/td>\nFigure D.1 \u2013 Amplifier linearity measurement setup <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
156<\/td>\nFigure D.2 \u2013 Example of linearity curve
Figure D.3 \u2013 Example of gain deviation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
158<\/td>\nAnnex E (informative) Guidance for product committees on the selection of test levels
E.1 General
E.2 Test levels related to general purposes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
159<\/td>\nE.3 Test levels related to the protection against RF emissions from digital radio telephones
Table E.1 \u2013 Examples of test levels, associated protection distances andperformance criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
160<\/td>\nE.4 Special measures for fixed transmitters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
161<\/td>\nAnnex F (informative) Selection of test methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
163<\/td>\nAnnex G (informative) Cable layout details
G.1 Intentions of EUT setup for radiated immunity test
G.2 Cable in the field
G.3 Cables leaving the test area
G.4 Turning the EUT cabinets <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
165<\/td>\nAnnex H (informative) Examples of test setups for large and heavy EUTs
H.1 EUTs with bottom fed cables
Figure H.1 \u2013 Example of a test setup for EUT with bottom fed underground cables (CMADs not shown) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
166<\/td>\nH.2 EUTs with overhead cables
Figure H.2 \u2013 Example of a test setup for EUTs with overhead cables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
167<\/td>\nH.3 EUTs with multiple cables and AEs
Figure H.3 \u2013 Example of a setup of EUTs with multiple cables and AEs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
168<\/td>\nH.4 Large EUTs with side fed cables and multiple UFA windows
Figure H.4 \u2013 Large EUTs with side fed cables and multiple UFAs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
169<\/td>\nAnnex I (informative) Testing with multiple signals
I.1 General
I.2 Intermodulation
Figure I.1 \u2013 Test frequencies f1 and f2 and intermodulation frequencies of the second and third order <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
170<\/td>\nI.3 Power requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
171<\/td>\nI.4 Level setting requirements
I.5 Linearity and harmonics checks
I.6 EUT performance criteria with multiple signals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
172<\/td>\nAnnex J (informative) Measurement uncertainty due to test instrumentation
J.1 General
J.2 Uncertainty budgets for level setting
J.2.1 Definition of the measurand
J.2.2 MU contributors of the measurand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
173<\/td>\nJ.2.3 Calculation examples for expanded uncertainty
Figure J.1 \u2013 Example of influences upon level setting
Table J.1 \u2013 Level setting process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
174<\/td>\nJ.2.4 Explanation of terms
Table J.2 \u2013 Test process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
175<\/td>\nJ.3 Application
J.4 Reference documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
176<\/td>\nAnnex K (informative) Calibration method for E-field probes
K.1 Overview
K.2 Probe calibration requirements
K.2.1 General
K.2.2 Calibration frequency range
K.2.3 Frequency steps <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
177<\/td>\nK.2.4 Field strength
K.3 Requirements for calibration instrumentation
K.3.1 General
K.3.2 Harmonics and spurious signals
Table K.1 \u2013 Calibration field strength level <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
178<\/td>\nK.3.3 Linearity check for probe
Table K.2 \u2013 Example for the probe linearity check <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
179<\/td>\nK.3.4 Determination of the gain of the standard horn antennas
Figure K.1 \u2013 Example of linearity for probe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
180<\/td>\nK.4 Field probe calibration in anechoic chambers
K.4.1 Calibration environments
K.4.2 Validation of anechoic chambers for field probe calibration <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
181<\/td>\nFigure K.2 \u2013 Setup for measuring net power to a transmitting device <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
183<\/td>\nFigure K.3 \u2013 Test setup for chamber validation test
Figure K.4 \u2013 Detail for measurement position (L <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
184<\/td>\nFigure K.5 \u2013 Example of data adjustment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
185<\/td>\nFigure K.6 \u2013 Example of the test layout for antenna and probe
Figure K.7 \u2013 Test setup for chamber validation test <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
186<\/td>\nK.4.3 Probe calibration procedure
Figure K.8 \u2013 Example of alternative chamber validation data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
187<\/td>\nFigure K.9 \u2013 Field probe calibration layout
Figure K.10 \u2013 Field probe calibration layout (top view) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
188<\/td>\nK.5 Other probe calibration environments and methods
K.5.1 General
K.5.2 Field probe calibration using TEM cells <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
189<\/td>\nK.5.3 Field probe calibration using waveguide chambers
Figure K.11 \u2013 Cross-sectional view of a waveguide chamber <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
190<\/td>\nK.5.4 Field probe calibration using open-ended waveguides
K.5.5 Calibration of field probes by gain transfer method
K.6 Reference documents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
192<\/td>\nBibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tracked Changes. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Testing and measurement techniques. Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Published By<\/td>\nPublication Date<\/td>\nNumber of Pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BSI<\/b><\/a><\/td>\n2020<\/td>\n194<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":362720,"template":"","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"product_cat":[626,2641],"product_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-362711","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-33-100-20","7":"product_cat-bsi","9":"first","10":"instock","11":"sold-individually","12":"shipping-taxable","13":"purchasable","14":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/362711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/362720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=362711"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=362711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}