{"id":344127,"date":"2024-10-20T00:09:53","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T00:09:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-en-iec-629602020\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T23:30:49","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T23:30:49","slug":"bs-en-iec-629602020","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-en-iec-629602020\/","title":{"rendered":"BS EN IEC 62960:2020"},"content":{"rendered":"
IEC 62960:2020 provides guidance on a review methodology for dependability from a technical perspective that is applicable at all stages of a system life cycle. Its application can improve the dependability of a system throughout its life cycle by triggering appropriate actions at appropriate times to address potential dependability problems. It provides guidance for developers, manufacturers, users and third-party independent reviewers such as consulting organizations. This document describes a dependability review methodology focusing on: – coherence of review activities across life cycle stages and their impact on dependability; – stakeholder identification and how this affects dependability review activities; – the relationships between different types of reviews; – procedures for effective dependability reviews; – examples of dependability review activities.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | English CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 3.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 3.2 Abbreviated terms 4 Introducing dependability reviews 4.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 4.2 Technical reviews 4.3 Status reviews <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | 4.4 Overview of the dependability review method 4.4.1 Overview 4.4.2 Identifying stakeholders <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 4.4.3 Identifying what the requirements are 4.4.4 Capturing information on actual performance 4.4.5 Assessing the gap between requirements and actual performance 4.4.6 Identifying risks and areas of concern <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 4.4.7 Recommending actions 4.5 Planning for and timing of dependability reviews <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 4.6 Levels of dependability reviews 4.6.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 4.6.2 Team reviews 4.6.3 Project reviews Figure 1 \u2013 Flow of reviews during a life cycle stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 4.6.4 Status reviews 5 Dependability review activities during the life cycle 5.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 5.2 Concept stage 5.3 Development stage 5.3.1 Overview <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 Design reviews <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 5.4 Realization stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 5.5 Utilization stage 5.6 Enhancement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 5.7 Retirement stage 6 Implementing the dependability review process 6.1 General 6.2 Planning of the review Figure 2 \u2013 Implementing the review process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 6.3 Selection of the review team 6.4 Preparation of the input package 6.5 Meeting notification and agenda <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 6.6 Conducting a review meeting 6.6.1 General 6.6.2 Meeting protocol <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 6.6.3 Action points 6.6.4 Recommendations 6.6.5 Rejected action points and recommendations 6.6.6 Meeting conclusion 6.7 Preparing and distributing review minutes 6.7.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | 6.7.2 Minutes 6.8 Actions and recommendations from a review <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | 6.9 Follow-up and completion of action points and recommendations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)Examples of an input package for a review A.1 Concept stage A.2 Development stage A.3 Realization stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | A.4 Utilization stage A.5 Enhancement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | A.6 Retirement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative)Examples of objectives for dependability reviews during the life cycle B.1 General B.2 Concept stage B.3 Development stage B.3.1 Conceptual design review B.3.2 Detail design review <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | B.3.3 Final design review B.4 Realization stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | B.5 Utilization stage B.5.1 Operation B.5.2 Maintenance B.6 Enhancement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | B.7 Retirement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative)Considerations during dependability reviews through the life cycle C.1 General C.2 Examples of dependability review considerations in the concept stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | C.3 Examples of dependability review considerations in the development stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | C.4 Examples of dependability review considerations in the realization stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | C.5 Examples of dependability review considerations in the utilization stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | C.6 Examples of dependability review considerations in the enhancement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | C.7 Examples of dependability review considerations in the retirement stage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | Annex D (informative)Functions and responsibilities of some key persons for a technical review D.1 General D.2 Chair <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | D.3 Secretary D.4 Relevant specialists <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | D.5 Project or team manager and members D.6 Customers and users <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | Annex E (informative)Dependability topics for a review E.1 General E.2 Reliability E.3 Maintainability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | E.4 Maintenance E.5 Maintenance support E.6 Availability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | E.7 Quality assurance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | E.8 Environmental effects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | E.9 Product safety E.10 Human factors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | E.11 Legal matters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | E.12 Durability E.13 Security E.14 Property damage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | E.15 Accountability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dependability reviews during the life cycle<\/b><\/p>\n |