IEC 62656-5:2017 specifies a method for representing activities and relations among the activities by a tabular ontology representation, called \u201cparcellized activity model\u201d or PAM for short, which is a specialized use of a generic tabular ontology data model, known as the parcellized ontology model (POM) defined in Part 1 of the IEC 62656 series. The activities that can be described by this document include part or whole of an enterprise, an organization or a collection of services, a set of events or processes which interact with each other by exchanging physical or non-physical entities. This part of IEC 62656 also defines a method for uniquely identifying activities, or their homologues happenings in a certain sequence. In addition, this document identifies flows of information, objects or materials exchanged among activities, where each of the activities is represented by a class and each flow by a relation.<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2<\/td>\n | National foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 5<\/td>\n | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 7<\/td>\n | English CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 1 Scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviations 3.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 14<\/td>\n | 3.2 Abbreviations 4 Overview 4.1 Activity described as an ontology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | 4.2 Use cases and key technical concepts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | Figures Figure 1 \u2013 See fine arts at Museum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | Figure 2 \u2013 Production operations management (extracted from IEC\u00a062264-3) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | Figure 3 \u2013 Production operations management modelled in PAM and depicted as IDEF-0 diagram <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | 4.3 Relation among properties of different activities 4.4 International Concept Identifier (ICID) 5 Basic structure of the PAM 5.1 Activity and arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | 5.2 Subactivities 5.2.1 General 5.2.2 Specialized activity 5.2.3 Component activity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | 5.3 ICOM representation 5.4 Role of the mechanism (M) in the PAM Figure 4 \u2013 Basic activity and its subcomponents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 5.5 External function call 5.6 Basic PAM notation with function symbols <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | Figure 5 \u2013 Corresponding IDEF0 diagram for basic PAM notation Tables Table 1 \u2013 Basic PAM notation for arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | Figure 6 \u2013 Sample activity drawing in IDEF0 and ICOM Figure 7 \u2013 Subactivities and arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 5.7 Joining arrows Figure 8 \u2013 Joining arrow example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | 5.8 Forking arrows 5.9 Branching or joining of arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | 5.10 Transcendental arrows 5.10.1 General Figure 9 \u2013 Forking arrow example <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 28<\/td>\n | Figure 10 \u2013 Transcendental arrows to be taken over by child nodes Figure 11 \u2013 Transcendental arrows from the parent node <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | 5.10.2 Modelling incoming arrows 5.10.3 Modelling outgoing arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 30<\/td>\n | 5.10.4 Modelling connections of arrows at frame boundary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 31<\/td>\n | 5.10.5 Contracted form of representation for branching and joining arrows Table 2 \u2013 Extracts of relation meta-class definitions for activities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | 5.10.6 Domain or codomain overloading for transcendent arrows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 33<\/td>\n | 5.11 Extended semantics beyond IDEF0 5.11.1 Specialized types of activity and its icon Table 3 \u2013 Contracted representation for connectivity of activities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | Figure 12 \u2013 IDEF0 extension for specialized activity node in the PAM <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 35<\/td>\n | 5.11.2 Conjunction node 5.11.3 Disjunction node Figure 13 \u2013 An implementation example of Conjunction node in the PAM <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 36<\/td>\n | 5.11.4 Complementation node 5.11.5 Selection node 5.11.6 Transformation node 5.11.7 Decision tree 5.12 Graphic properties of arrows 5.13 Arrow specialization <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 37<\/td>\n | 5.14 Delegated formula interpretation Figure 14 \u2013 Super relation and its application for specialized activity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 38<\/td>\n | Table 4 \u2013 Reserved keywords for formula interpretation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 39<\/td>\n | Annex A (normative) Meta-properties for activity description A.1 General A.2 List of meta-properties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 40<\/td>\n | Table A.1 \u2013 Meta-properties of relation meta-class used for activity description (1 of 2) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 42<\/td>\n | Annex B (informative) Description examples for the PAM B.1 Design product <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 43<\/td>\n | Figure B.1 \u2013 Class meta-class example of the PAM for \u201cdesign product\u201d activity (1 of 2) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 45<\/td>\n | Figure B.2 \u2013 Property meta-class example of the PAM for \u201cdesign product\u201d activity (1 of 2) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 47<\/td>\n | Figure B.3 \u2013 Relation meta-class example of the PAM for \u201cdesign product\u201d activity (1 of 6) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 53<\/td>\n | B.2 Sample IDEF0 Diagram <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 54<\/td>\n | Figure B.4 \u2013 IDEF0 diagram image corresponding to A-0 (frame containing A0) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 55<\/td>\n | Figure B.5 \u2013 IDEF0 diagram image corresponding to A0 (frame containing subactivities of A0) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 56<\/td>\n | Annex C (informative) Example PAM data for production operations management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 57<\/td>\n | Figure C.1 \u2013 Class meta-class example for production operations management defined in IEC\u00a062264-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 58<\/td>\n | Figure C.2 \u2013 Property meta-class example for production operations management defined in IEC\u00a062264-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 59<\/td>\n | Figure C.3 \u2013 Relation meta-class example for production operations management defined in IEC\u00a062264-3 (1 of 3) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 62<\/td>\n | Figure C.4 \u2013 Autogenerated IDEF 0 A-0 (top) node for production operations management defined in IEC\u00a062264-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 63<\/td>\n | Figure C.5 \u2013 Autogenerated IDEF A0 node for production operations management defined in IEC\u00a062264-3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 64<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Standardized product ontology register and transfer by spreadsheets – Interface for activity description<\/b><\/p>\n |