{"id":238770,"date":"2024-10-19T15:36:22","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T15:36:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-62131-42011\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T10:17:45","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T10:17:45","slug":"bsi-pd-iec-tr-62131-42011","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-62131-42011\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD IEC\/TR 62131-4:2011"},"content":{"rendered":"

IEC\/TR 62131-4, which is a technical report, reviews the available dynamic data relating to electrotechnical equipment transported by road vehicles. The intent is that from all the available data an environmental description will be generated and compared to that set out in IEC 60721 [25]1<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

For each of the sources identified the quality of the data is reviewed and checked for self consistency. The process used to undertake this check of data quality and that used to intrinsically categorize the various data sources is set out in IEC\/TR 62131-1.<\/p>\n

This technical report primarily addresses data extracted from a number of different sources for which reasonable confidence exists as to the quality and validity. The report also presents data for which the quality and validity cannot realistically be reviewed. These data are included to facilitate validation of information from other sources. The report clearly indicates when utilizing information in this latter category.<\/p>\n

This technical report addresses data from a number of data gathering exercises. The quantity and quality of data in these exercises varies considerably as does the range of road (and test track) conditions covered. The vast majority of the road conditions are from Western Europe. It is believed that one of the data sources considered is that used to set the current IEC 60721 severities. However, review of that data indicates the inclusion of some quite old vehicles.<\/p>\n

Relatively little of the data reviewed were made available in electronic form. To permit comparison to be made in this assessment, a quantity of the original (non-electronic) data have been manually digitized.<\/p>\n

PDF Catalog<\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\nPDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nCONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nFOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Data source and quality
3.1 SRETS road and test track measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n3.2 CEEES \u2018round robin\u2019 10 tonne truck measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\n3.3 Various vehicle measurements by Hoppe and Gerock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\n3.4 Millbrook measurements on Landrover Defender
3.5 Millbrook measurements on Ford transit van <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\n3.6 Millbrook measurements on Renault Magnum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\n3.7 Supplementary data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\n4 Intra data source comparison
4.1 General remark
4.2 SRETS road and test track measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\n4.3 CEEES \u2018round robin\u2019 10 tonne truck measurements
4.4 Various vehicle measurements by Hoppe and Gerock <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\n4.5 Millbrook measurements on Landrover Defender, Ford Transit Van and Renault Magnum
4.6 Renault Trafic (1,9 tonne) and TRM 1000 (20 Tonne)
4.7 Various US road vehicles circa 1970 and circa mid 1980\u2019s
5 Inter data source comparison <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\n6 Identified test severities
7 Environmental description <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\n8 Comparison with IEC\u00a060721 and IEC\u00a060068 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\n9 Recommendations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nTables
\n
Table 1 \u2013 Summary of SRETS journeys
Table 2 \u2013 Summary of measurements made by Bosch using a numberof vehicles and under different test conditions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nFigures
\n
Figure 1 \u2013 Schematic of SRETS vehicles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nFigure 2 \u2013 Effective values of all runs from covert SRETS measurements
Figure 3 \u2013 All PSD form covert SRETS measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nFigure 4 \u2013 Comparison of SRETS amplitudes in the 3 axis
Figure 5 \u2013 Comparison of SRETS measurements made with driver\u2019s knowledge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nFigure 6 \u2013 Comparison of SRETS PSDs of different vehicles (v1, v2,v3) and road categories made with driver\u2019s knowledge
Figure 7 \u2013 Comparison of SRETS measurements made without driver\u2019s knowledge (covert) and with driver\u2019s knowledge (overt) on different roads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nFigure 8 \u2013 Comparison of different SRETS vehicles at the load platform \u2013 Measurements made with driver\u2019s knowledge
Figure 9 \u2013 Comparison of SRETS measurements with different road categories \u2013 Made with driver\u2019s knowledge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nFigure 10 \u2013 Comparison of vertical SRETS time and signal triggered data made without driver\u2019s knowledge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nFigure 12 \u2013 Power spectral density of SRETS time and signal triggered data made without driver\u2019s knowledge
Figure 13 \u2013 Peak hold PSD of SRETS time and signal triggered datamade without driver\u2019s knowledge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nFigure 14 \u2013 APD of the SRETS measured data made without driver\u2019s knowledge
Figure 15 \u2013 Fitting of SRETS APD with multiple gaussian distributions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nFigure 16 \u2013 Vertical SRS of SRETS measured amplitudes greater than 5 g \u2013Made without driver\u2019s knowledge
Figure 17 \u2013 Lateral SRS of SRETS measured amplitudes greater than 5 g \u2013Made without driver\u2019s knowledge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nFigure 18 Vibration r.m.s. against time for CEEES analysis
Figure 19 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. against vehicle velocity for CEEES analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\nFigure 20 \u2013 Acceleration peaks against vehicle velocity for CEEES analysis
Figure 21 \u2013 Vibration PSD analysis from CEEES \u2018round robin\u2019 exercise <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nFigure 22 \u2013 Shock SRS analysis from CEEES \u2018round robin\u2019 exercise
Figure 23 \u2013 Vibration test severities from CEEES \u2018round robin\u2019 exercise <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nFigure 24 \u2013 Composite vibration PSD of CEEES measurements
Figure 25 \u2013 Composite vibration APD from CEEES measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nFigure 26 \u2013 Vibration PSD from degraded roads on CEEES measurements
Figure 27 \u2013 Shocks from CEEES measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nFigure 28 \u2013 Typical vibration PSD from Hoppe and Gerock measurements
Table 3 \u2013 Vehicles included in Hoppe and Gerock measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nTable 4 \u2013 Shock occurrences from Hoppe and Gerock measurements
Table 5 \u2013 Probable\u201d shock durations from Hoppe and Gerock measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nFigure 29 \u2013 Envelope of vibration PSD from Hoppe and Gerock measurements
Figure 30 \u2013 Number of shocks per 100 km FROM Hoppe and Gerock measurements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nFigure 31 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. from Millbrook measurements on landrover
Figure 32 \u2013 Shock peaks from Millbrook measurements on landrover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nFigure 33 \u2013 Vibration PSD from Millbrook measurements on landrover
Figure 34 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. from Millbrook measurements on transit van <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nFigure 35 \u2013 Maximum PSD values FROM Millbrook measurements on transit van
Figure 36 \u2013 Shock amplitudes from Millbrook measurements on transit van <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nFigure 37 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. from Millbrook measurements on Renault Magnum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nFigure 39 \u2013 Shock amplitudes from Millbrook measurements on Renault Magnum
Figure 40 \u2013 Maximum PSD values from Millbrook measurements on Renault Magnum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51<\/td>\nFigure 41 \u2013 Vibration PSD from GAM EG 13 measurements on Renault Traffic
Table 6 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. from GAM EG 13 measurements on Renault Traffic <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52<\/td>\nFigure 42 \u2013 Vibration PSD from GAM EG 13 measurements on RVI TRM 1000
Table 7 \u2013 Vibration r.m.s. from GAM EG 13 measurements on RVI TRM 1000 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
53<\/td>\nFigure 43 \u2013 Vibration severities from Mil Std 810 (Foley)
Figure 44 \u2013 Vibration severities from Mil Std 810 (Connon) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
54<\/td>\nFigure 45 \u2013 Data from ASTM 4728-91
Figure 46 \u2013 Data from ASTM D4278-95 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
55<\/td>\nFigure 47 \u2013 Data from EXACT DK 1 \u2013 237
Figure 48 \u2013 Data from reference 15 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
56<\/td>\nFigure 49 \u2013 Data from ASTM D 4728-95
Figure 50 \u2013 Data from reference 16 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
57<\/td>\nFigure 51 \u2013 SRETS test severity from PSD
Figure 52 \u2013 SRETS test severity from PSD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
58<\/td>\nTable 8 \u2013 SRETS shock test definition to augment vibration test from PSD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
59<\/td>\nFigure 53 \u2013 SRETS test severity from r.m.s. (including shocks)
Figure 54 \u2013 SRETS test severity from r.m.s. (including shocks) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
60<\/td>\nFigure 55 \u2013 Test severities from UK defence standard
Figure 56 \u2013 Test severities from NATO STANAG <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
61<\/td>\nFigure 57 \u2013 Test severities from ASTM D 4728-95
Figure 58 \u2013 Test severity from ETA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
62<\/td>\nFigure 59 \u2013 Test severities from CEN and ISO
Figure 60 \u2013 Test severities from ETS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
63<\/td>\nFigure 61 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-2-2:1997 [26] \u2013 Random vibration severity
Figure 62 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013 Random vibration severity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
64<\/td>\nFigure 63 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-3-2:1997 \u2013 Sinusoidal vibration severity
Figure 64 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013 Sinusoidal vibration severity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
65<\/td>\nFigure 65 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-3-2:1997 \u2013 Shock severity
Figure 66 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013 Shock severity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
66<\/td>\nFigure 67 \u2013 IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013 Recommended repeated shock severity
Figure 68 \u2013 Comparison of the effects of IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013Random and sinusoidal vibration severities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
67<\/td>\nFigure 69 \u2013 Comparison of the effects of IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013Random and sinusoidal vibration severities
Figure 70 \u2013 Comparison of the effects of IEC\u00a060721-4-2:1997 \u2013Random and sinusoidal vibration severities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
68<\/td>\nBibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Environmental conditions. Vibration and shock of electrotechnical equipment – Equipment transported in road vehicles<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Published By<\/td>\nPublication Date<\/td>\nNumber of Pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BSI<\/b><\/a><\/td>\n2011<\/td>\n72<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":238776,"template":"","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"product_cat":[2641],"product_tag":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-238770","1":"product","2":"type-product","3":"status-publish","4":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"product_cat-bsi","8":"first","9":"instock","10":"sold-individually","11":"shipping-taxable","12":"purchasable","13":"product-type-simple"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/238770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/238776"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_cat?post=238770"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product_tag?post=238770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}